Hydrophilic Intraocular Lens Opacification � A Case Report

Purpose : To report a case of late opacification of the hydrophilic acrylic Intraocular Lens (IOL) after uneventful Cataract Surgery. Methods : A 60-year-old male presented with chief complaint of gradual diminution of vision in right eye over the past one year. He was Normotensive, Non-diabetic and had a normal Lipid Profile. History revealed that he underwent uneventful phacoemulsification with posterior chamber hydrophilic intraocular in the bag implantation for pre-senile cataract in his Right Eye ten years ago. He had the best corrected visual acuity of 6/6 in his Right Eye for nine years Post Cataract Surgery. Slit-lamp examination confirmed Intraocular Lens Opacification. Results : Intraocular Lens exchange was performed in his Right Eye. The hydrophilic IOL was replaced with poly methyl methacrylate intraocular lens. The explanted IOL showed uniform grayish-white opacification. Post operative period was uneventful. Intraocular pressure by applanation tonometry was 16.4 mm Hg in both the eyes. Patient抯 best corrected visual acuity was 6/6 with -1 D Cyl. at 90 degree, Postoperatively. Over a follow up period of one year, the patient did not develop complications like posterior capsular IOL opacification. Conclusion: Intraocular Lens opacification is an extremely rare late postoperative complication of Phacoemulsification which can be managed effectively by IOL exchange procedure in cases of opacified IOL optics causing visual morbidity

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography of intraocular lens opacification

Postoperative opacification of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) is an uncommon complication. A 57-year-old diabetic female who had undergone phacoemulsification with IOL implantation in her right eye 16 years back presented with diminution of vision in the same eye for 3 years. Significant IOL opacification was observed clinically and anterior segment optical coherence tomography clearly delineated the intraoptic deposits, sparing the haptics, and edges of the optic. IOL explant and exchange was performed leading to restoration of visual acuity to 6/9. Histochemical evaluation of the IOL confirmed that the hydrophilic acrylic IOL optic had calcium deposits.

A Case of Late-onset Capsular Block Syndrome, Resulting in the Misdiagnosis of Intraocular Lens Opacity

PURPOSE: We report a case of late-onset capsular block syndrome, which resulted in a misdiagnosis of intraocular lens (IOL) opacity. CASE SUMMARY: A 59-year-old man visited our clinic with reduced visual acuity in the right eye from 1 year prior. He had undergone uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery by phacoemulsification with IOL implants at another hospital 10 years before. There was no specific history with the exception of hypertension. After being diagnosed in the ophthalmology clinic with IOL degeneration and opacity in the right eye, he was referred to our hospital for IOL replacement. Upon examination, his right uncorrected visual acuity was 0.06 and intraocular pressure was 22 mmHg. The refractive error could not be checked due to IOL opacity. Slit-lamp microscopy revealed a cloudy, milky IOL. Anterior-segment optical coherence tomography of the right eye showed retention of a highly reflective material in the lens capsule behind the IOL. Posterior capsule enlargement of the right eye was confirmed on ultrasound biomicroscopy. After neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy was performed, the homogeneous space disappeared and the eye recovered normal visual acuity. CONCLUSIONS: Capsular block syndrome is a rare complication that can occur shortly (1 day to 2 days) after cataract surgery. Late-onset capsular block syndrome, which occurs 10 years after surgery differs from typical clinical manifestations. Thus, capsular block syndrome is an important consideration upon the presentation of opacification due to IOL degeneration.

Intraocular lens exchange through a 3.2-mm corneal incision for opacified intraocular lenses.

Aim: The aim was to evaluate visual and refractive results and complications of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange through a 3.2 mm corneal incision for opacified IOLs. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study comprised 33 eyes of 32 patients with IOL opacification requiring an IOL exchange between July 2003 and March 2007. Exchange surgery was performed through a 3.2-mm temporal clear corneal incision followed by implantation of a new foldable hydrophobic IOL. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), topographical astigmatism, and refractive cylinder were evaluated. Surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was calculated and complications were recorded. Results: Opacification was observed in 25 eyes (76%) with Aqua-Sense, 3 eyes (9%) with Hydroview, 3 eyes (9%) with MemoryLens IOLs, and 2 eyes (6%) with DgR. The mean follow-up period was 36.54 months. An uneventful IOL exchange was achieved in 18 eyes (55%). Zonular dehiscence occurred in 9 eyes (27%), and posterior capsule tear developed in 4 eyes (12%). The mean preoperative BSCVA (mean ± standard deviation, decimal scale) was 0.13 ± 0.08 (mean: 20/150, range 20/2000 to 20/60) and improved to 0.63 ± 0.18 (mean: 20/32, range 20/60 to 20/20, P < 0.001). The mean SIA was 0.70 D. Seven eyes (21%) had 0.5 D or lower SIA. Conclusion: IOL exchange is a technically challenging procedure with potential risks of reversing the advantages of a prior small-incision cataract surgery. The use of a small corneal incision for IOL exchange could preserve the advantages of modern phacoemulsification surgery with acceptable SIA related to the procedure.

Clinical Efficacy and Complications of Intraocular Lens Exchange for Opacified Intraocular Lenses

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and complications of intraocular lens (IOL) exchange. METHODS: A review of medical records was performed for 52 eyes that had undergone an IOL exchange due to IOL opacification. Surgical complications and their incidences were analyzed. The mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after the IOL exchange was compared with the mean pre-exchange BCVA and with the mean BCVA after the initial IOL implantation. Prediction error of refraction and biometric data obtained for the IOL exchange were, if available, compared with those obtained for the initial IOL implantation. The prediction error for the IOL exchange, calculated from the biometric data obtained before the IOL exchange, was compared with that calculated from the measurements obtained before the initial IOL implantation. RESULTS: The overall complication rates were low and no serious complications were found. The mean BCVA improved significantly after the IOL exchange and was not significantly different from that obtained after the initial IOL implantation. However, the refractive prediction for the IOL exchange was not as good as it was for the initial IOL implantation, which was thought to be related with difficulties in axial length (AL) measurements. Biometric data taken before the initial IOL implantation was associated with a significantly better refractive prediction than those taken before the IOL exchange. CONCLUSIONS: IOL exchange was both efficacious and safe for visual recovery. However, IOL exchange was related with increased difficulty of predicting postoperative refraction; difficulties in AL measurements are the suggested cause.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Opacification of Hydorphilic Acrylic Intraocular Lens after Cataract Surgery

PURPOSE: To report the clinical characteristics of patients with opacification of intraocular lens (IOL) after cataract surgery with hydrophilic acrylic IOL. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation was performed for 102 eyes of 74 patients who had undergone cataract extraction, with insertion of hydrophilic acrylic IOL (ACRL-C160). The medical records of 91 eyes of 69 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical characteristics of the patients with IOL opacification were analyzed, and the characteristics were compared between the groups of patients with and without IOL opacification. RESULTS: In 70 eyes of 52 patients IOL opacification developed. The incidence was 19.8% at 6 months, 52.3% at 1 year, and 84.1% at 2 years after cataract surgery. The onset of IOL opacification ranged from 2 to 25 months (11.1 months on average). The incidence of IOL opacification was not affected by systemic disease such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. In the group of patients with IOL opacification, the onset of IOL opacification occured earlier than in the patient group with diabetes mellitus and it also developed earlier in patients with longer duration of diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy. IOL opacification was more severe in patients with retinopathy than in those without diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of hydrophilic acrylic IOL opacification increased over time and had risen to 84.1% of cases at 2 years after surgery. Although patients with generalized disease were not associated with the development of IOL opacification, the presence of diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy affected the onset and severity of IOL opacification.